Re: Alternative database locations are broken

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alternative database locations are broken
Date: 2000-11-06 17:40:47
Message-ID: 20001106114047.C31151@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:13:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> > Hmm, I know NT's not really a target, supported OS, but enshrining
> > symlinks in a the design of a backend feature makes it really difficult
> > to keep even the semblance of support.
>
> As long as we don't require symlinks to exist for standard setups,
> I have no trouble at all with decreeing that alternate database
> locations won't work on NT.

Just tested 'ln -s' under Cygwin bash, and at least less and cat follow
the link, notepad.exe and wordpad.exe open the link file. Checking the
Cygwin FAQ, I see that this was a red herring: postgres, being a cygwin
app, should follow symlinks just fine.

Ross
--
Open source code is like a natural resource, it's the result of providing
food and sunshine to programmers, and then staying out of their way.
[...] [It] is not going away because it has utility for both the developers
and users independent of economic motivations. Jim Flynn, Sunnyvale, Calif.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Hollomon 2000-11-06 18:09:19 Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-06 17:13:31 Re: Alternative database locations are broken