Re: Now 376175 lines of code

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Franck Martin <Franck(at)sopac(dot)org>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Now 376175 lines of code
Date: 2000-10-20 01:29:17
Message-ID: 200010200129.VAA00511@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes.

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> What is amazing, is that you can make such complete system on Linux with
> only 376k of code...
>
> I think bloated software is not part of your dictionnary, and that's good...
>
> Franck Martin
> Database Development Officer
> SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
> Fiji
> E-mail: franck(at)sopac(dot)org <mailto:franck(at)sopac(dot)org>
> Web site: http://www.sopac.org/ <http://www.sopac.org/>
>
> This e-mail is intended for its recipients only. Do not forward this
> e-mail without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be
> neccessarily the views of SOPAC.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:03 PM
> To: Ross J. Reedstrom
> Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Now 376175 lines of code
>
>
> Never mind. I see I ran it already on 7.0 and got 376k. You used my
> idential script to get these numbers. I will use your nice numbers for
> a presentation at the show in two weeks. Thanks a lot.
>
>
>
> > On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and
> > > > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley.
> > > > 376175
> > > > Seems someone has been busy. :-)
> > >
> > > Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code?
> > > Do you have the same numbers for other milestones?
> >
> > Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh,
> > Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen
> > to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last
> > one I found at Berkeley:
> >
> > postgres-v4r2 244581
> > postgres95-1.09 178976
> > postgresql-6.1.1 200709
> > postgresql-6.3.2 260809
> > postgresql-6.4.0 297479
> > postgresql-6.4.2 297918
> > postgresql-6.5.3 331278
> >
> > Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs
> > for most of these)
> >
> > HTH,
> > Ross
> > --
> > Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
> > NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> > Computer and Information Technology Institute
> > Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
> >
>
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-10-20 02:14:04 Re: Re: pg_dump docs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-20 01:03:00 Re: Now 376175 lines of code