Re: possible constraint bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Swan <tswan(at)olemiss(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: possible constraint bug?
Date: 2000-10-12 20:25:08
Message-ID: 200010122025.QAA18140@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Is this addressed in 7.1?
>
> Not as far as I know.
> It would require one or more of:
> ALTER FUNCTION
> ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT
> a reference system that automatically drops/
> restricts based on objects referencing the
> thing you drop (and this wouldn't make sense
> for constraints without alter ... drop
> constraint anyway).
>
>

Added to TODO:

* Add ALTER FUNCTION
* Add ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT
* Automatically drop constraints/functions when object is dropped

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2000-10-12 20:30:48 Re: [patch,rfc] binary operators on integers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-12 20:18:05 Re: Precedence of '|' operator (was Re: [patch, rfc] binary operators on integers)