Re: The query cache - first snapshot (long)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The query cache - first snapshot (long)
Date: 2000-07-27 03:36:07
Message-ID: 200007270336.XAA12552@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> * PREPARE/EXECUTE
>
> - For tests I use query that not use some table (the executor is
> in boredom state), but is difficult for the parser. An example:
>
> SELECT 'a text ' || (10*10+(100^2))::text || ' next text ' || cast
> (date_part('year', timestamp 'now') AS text );
>
> - (10000 * this query):
>
> standard select: 54 sec
> via prepare/execute: 4 sec (93% better)
>
> IMHO it is nod bad.
>
> - For standard query like:
>
> SELECT u.usename, r.relname FROM pg_class r, pg_user u WHERE
> r.relowner = u.usesysid;
>
> it is with PREPARE/EXECUTE 10-20% faster.
>
>
> I will *very glad* if someone try and test patch; some discussion is wanted
> too.

Wow, just when I thought we couldnd't get much faster. That is great.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-27 03:43:16 Re: Hello PL/Python
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-27 03:27:09 Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of lar ge index items