From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Connection pooling. |
Date: | 2000-07-12 07:09:47 |
Message-ID: | 20000712000947.D25571@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [000712 00:04] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [000711 22:53] wrote:
> >> The killer problem here is that you can't hand off a connection
> >> accepted by the postmaster to a backend except by fork() --- at least
> >> not with methods that work on a wide variety of Unixen.
>
> > The code has been around since 4.2BSD, it takes a bit of #ifdef to
> > get it right on all systems but it's not impossible, have a look at
> > http://www.fhttpd.org/ for a web server that does this in a portable
> > fashion.
>
> I looked at this to see if it would teach me something I didn't know.
> It doesn't. It depends on sendmsg() which is a BSD-ism and not very
> portable.
It's also specified by Posix.1g if that means anything.
-Alfred
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2000-07-12 07:16:32 | Re: 7.0.2 issues / Geocrawler |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-12 07:04:13 | Re: Connection pooling. |