Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Date: 2000-07-06 20:45:49
Message-ID: 200007062045.QAA12417@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > Will you accept modifications to this if submit'd, to make better use of
> > features that PostgreSQL has to improve performance? Just downloaded it
> > and am going to look her through, just wondering if it would be a waste of
> > time for me to suggest changes though :)
>
> If you can figure out an algorithm that shows these nested messages more
> efficiently on postgres, then that would be a pretty compelling reason
> to move SourceForge to Postgres instead of MySQL, which is totally
> reaching its limits on our site. Right now, neither database appears
> like it will work, so Oracle is starting to loom on the horizon.

All I can say is, "Yikes". Let's see if we can help this guy.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Janík ml. 2000-07-06 21:06:09 Re: current CVS: undefined reference to `PGLZ_RAW_SIZE'
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-06 20:43:26 Re: 2nd update on TOAST