From: | JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL GENERAL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this more palatable?? |
Date: | 2000-07-05 09:10:27 |
Message-ID: | 200007050910.LAA08922@hot.jw.home |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner wrote:
>
> Am I correct in saying that you agree that the GPL is where we should be,
> but you want people to go there of their own free will?
Right. Someone who doesn't want to make his code "FREE" in
the entire meaning of this word but want to make it open for
any non-commercial use should choose it. IMHO the GPL
includes "this is the one and only truth and must propagate
up into everything started on something that once went under
this license". Who am I to restrict my code in that way? Can
I see the future?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | planx plnetx | 2000-07-05 09:15:03 | Re: REFERENCES troubles |
Previous Message | planx plnetx | 2000-07-05 09:09:02 | Re: Glade or wxPython and Postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-05 09:31:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-07-05 09:07:56 | AW: regular expressions troubles with char cols |