Re: anyone heard of "recall"?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Blakeley <mike(at)blakeley(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anyone heard of "recall"?
Date: 2000-06-28 17:55:11
Message-ID: 200006281755.NAA20999@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Here's an interesting approach to redundancy - I wonder how much of a
> performance hit postgres would take if it optionally used this for
> underlying table storage?
> http://www.fault-tolerant.org/recall/recall-faq.html
>
> Browsing through the cvs tree, I even see a postgres directory -
> apparently they're doing some work on exactly this idea, and have run
> into some stumbling blocks. I know that replication questions and
> RFEs pop up frequently on this list - maybe this'll provide a
> solution for some folks.

Yes, looks interesting.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

  • test at 2000-06-29 03:14:50 from igor

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-06-28 17:55:25 Re: Lingering Backend Processes
Previous Message Michael Blakeley 2000-06-28 17:48:50 anyone heard of "recall"?