Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-18 23:36:59
Message-ID: 200006182336.TAA19651@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > Not to mention the reverse: if I read this right, you have to suck
> > up your GB's long in advance of actually needing them. That's OK
> > for a machine that's dedicated to Oracle ... not so OK for smaller
> > installations, playpens, etc.
>
> To me it looks like a way to make Oracle work on VMS machines. This is the way
> files are allocated on Digital hardware.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-06-18 23:43:42 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-18 23:01:12 Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-06-18 23:43:42 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-18 23:32:49 Re: odbc patches