Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de (Jan Wieck)
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-18 00:36:01
Message-ID: 200006180036.CAA07529@hot.jw.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Don Baccus wrote:
> At 11:46 AM 6/16/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I personally dislike depending on symlinks to move stuff around.
> Among other things, a pg_dump/restore (and presumably future
> backup tools?) can't recreate the disk layout automatically.
>

Most impact from this one, IMHO.

Not that Oracle tools are able to do it either. But I think
it's more trivial to recreate a 30+ tablespace layout on the
disks than to recreate all symlinks for a 20,000+
tables/indices database like an SAP R/3 one.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-18 01:07:18 Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-06-18 00:20:15 Re: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-18 03:16:22 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-06-18 00:20:15 Re: Big 7.1 open items