Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Michael Robinson <robinson(at)netrinsics(dot)com>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, robinson(at)netrinsics(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-15 04:52:20
Message-ID: 200006150452.MAA04005@netrinsics.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>The issue is that some people felt we shouldn't be performing such
>checks, and some did.

Well, more precisely, the issue was stalemated at "one person felt we
should perform such checks" and "one person (who, incidentally, wrote the
code) felt we shouldn't".

Obviously, as it stands, the issue is going nowhere.

I was just hoping to encourage more people to examine the problem, so that
we might get a consensus one way or the other.

-Michael Robinson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-06-15 06:03:12 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-15 04:33:55 RE: input/output functions have been changed ?