| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for better large objects support |
| Date: | 2000-06-12 19:46:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200006121946.PAA00272@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> > > > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
> > >
> > > 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.
> > > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > > way around.
> >
> > This stuff is going into 7.1, and TOAST will be there. Also TOAST will
> > not be inefficient for small objects.
>
> Sorry. Maybe my english is a little bit dumb. I said that TOAST will be inefficient
> for really large objects. And for small objects it will be much more efficient.
I think we will have good performance up to 1 gig.
>
> BTW, when 7.1 is planned?
August.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-12 20:56:37 | Re: Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek. |
| Previous Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-06-12 18:13:42 | Re: Patch for better large objects support |