From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: config files in /data |
Date: | 2000-05-30 21:30:11 |
Message-ID: | 200005302130.RAA23855@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, 30 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Seems we should have pg_hba.conf and other files in a separate
> > directory, not /data.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> I still say that pg_hba.conf should be eliminated altogether, in favor of
> something that is modifiable by anyone that the supeuser gives permissions
> to create databases too ... what's the point of having that ability if you
> can't access the database after its created?
>
> Seems kinda anti-friendly to the DBA to be able to have
> "sub-ordinates" that can create users and databases, but has to be bug'd
> in order to allow them to be accessed ...
>
> pg_hba should become another system table that can be modified with simple
> SQL queries, and is modifiable (readable?) only by those with createdb
> privileges ...
And have it dump like pg_shadow. Yea, I guess we could do that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-30 21:40:51 | Re: secondary password files |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-30 21:24:29 | Re: config files in /data |