From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze |
Date: | 2000-05-29 16:13:51 |
Message-ID: | 200005291613.MAA12883@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, 29 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I have changed vacuum so analyze now uses AccessShareLock. (Is this the
> > proper lock for analyze?)
> >
> > The code will now vacuum all requested relations. It will then analyze
> > each relation. This way, all the exclusive vacuum work is done first,
> > then analyze can continue with shared locks.
>
> hrmmm, here's a thought ... why not vacuum->analyze each relation in
> order? the 'exclusive lock' will prevent anyone from reading, so do a
> relation, release the lock to analyze that relation and let ppl access the
> database ... then do the next ... instead of doing an exclusive lock for
> the duration of the whole database ...
No, each table is locked one at a time. We do all the single-table
locks first so the rest is all shared access. Does that make sense?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-29 16:40:47 | Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-29 16:12:56 | Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze |