Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf(at)noris(dot)net>
Cc: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license)
Date: 2000-05-20 11:29:39
Message-ID: 200005201129.HAA15352@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hi,
>
> Alex Pilosov:
> > The only (completely) real solution for this is to use raw devices,
> > uncached by the kernel, without any filesystem overhead...
> >
> ...and with no OS caching _at_all_.
>
> > Are there any plans to support that?
> >
> IMHO it's interesting to note that even Oracle, which used to be one of
> the "you gotta use a raw partition if you want any speed at all" guys,
> has moved into the "use a normal partition or a regular file unless you
> do things like sharing a RAID between two hosts" camp.

Yes, we noticed that. We are glad we didn't waste time going in that
direction.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-20 11:35:38 Re: rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-20 11:28:45 Re: contextual search