| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "'Michael A(dot) Olson'" <mao(at)sleepycat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Berkeley DB license |
| Date: | 2000-05-16 18:29:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200005161829.OAA18134@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> How can we integrate SDB code into PostgreSQL without MVCC support
> in SDB if we still want to have MVCC?! I missed something?
> Or you ask is replacement+changes_in_SDB_for_MVCC easier than
> WAL+new_our_smgr? I don't know.
I guess I was asking if MVCC could be implemented on top of SDB, rather
than changes made to SDB itself.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-05-16 18:32:29 | SET type (was Re: WAL versus Postgres) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-16 18:28:50 | Re: Berkeley DB license |