Re: Now 376175 lines of code

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Now 376175 lines of code
Date: 2000-05-11 15:23:42
Message-ID: 20000511102342.B10872@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and
> > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley.
> > 376175
> > Seems someone has been busy. :-)
>
> Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code?
> Do you have the same numbers for other milestones?

Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh,
Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen
to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last
one I found at Berkeley:

postgres-v4r2 244581
postgres95-1.09 178976
postgresql-6.1.1 200709
postgresql-6.3.2 260809
postgresql-6.4.0 297479
postgresql-6.4.2 297918
postgresql-6.5.3 331278

Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs
for most of these)

HTH,
Ross
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-11 15:25:47 Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-11 14:58:30 Re: Multibyte still broken