SQL92 standard corrections

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: SQL92 standard corrections
Date: 2000-03-01 19:30:14
Message-ID: 20000301133014.B15773@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 01:11:32PM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
>
> On a completely unrelated note: Apparently, there was a "bug fix" to
> SQL92, published in 1996, that goes by the name:
>
> Technical Corrigendum 1:1996 to ISO/IEC 9075:1992
>
> According to the www.iso.ch site in Switzerland, this thing is 80
> pages long. Even given the usual front matter, indices, and appendices,
> there's got to be something in there that we need to know. Hmm, it's
> marked as free. Perhaps I'll see if I can order it somewhere.
>
> Anyone seen this?
>

Following up to myself: Turns out there was _another_ TC published in
1999:

ISO/IEC 9075:1992/Cor 3:1999 (Don't ask _me_ where Cor 2 went ;-)

This one's 112 pages. Hmm, time to call my local librarian and see how one
gets a hold of ISO standards around here.

Ross
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Willy De la Court 2000-03-01 19:58:07 empty dates and changing the default date behaviour
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-03-01 19:28:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types