Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings
Date: 2000-02-26 15:36:20
Message-ID: 200002261536.KAA02325@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I see tables that have two or three varchar(4000) columns with other
> data, i.e. names and stuff that are also varchar but smaller. I know
> that these don't actually get stuffed with 4000 chars but rather
> that 4KB is the upper limit of the size of an Oracle varchar and that
> the author's been lazy. If I had a compressed text or varchar type
> I'd be quite confident that the application code would run even with
> an 8KB block size.

Just to clearify, varchar(4000) does not take 4000 chars on disk, while
char(4000) does use 4000 chars on the disk.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-26 17:15:19 Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-26 14:58:40 Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings