| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT |
| Date: | 2000-01-29 17:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200001291724.MAA28548@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 2000-01-28, Tom Lane mentioned:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > I'd like to yank the END/ABORT commands, since they're non-standard and
> > > redundant (COMMIT/ROLLBACK). Anyone who could not bear to see them go?
> >
> > Exactly what will this accomplish, other than breaking a lot of existing
> > applications? (Including all of mine, which no doubt biases my thinking.)
>
> Okay, I was just wondering. But I'm going to change all the notices and
> docs to use commit and rollback instead.
Great.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-29 17:26:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-29 17:23:45 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check |