Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Brothers <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Date: 2000-01-28 17:19:38
Message-ID: 200001281719.MAA28643@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Hiroshi neglected to mention that you'd probably need to drop and
> >> recreate the index after applying the patch; if it's indeed out of
> >> order, just patching the comparator bug isn't enough to fix it.
>
> > Does Hiroshi's patch get applied?
>
> Now that I understand the problem, yes, his patch is good as far as
> it goes. There are probably other places with the same problem...

Applied.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message davidb 2000-01-28 19:41:52 How to handle non-postgres questions?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-28 17:19:11 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-28 17:26:02 Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-28 17:19:11 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Huillard 2000-01-28 21:41:43 RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-28 17:19:11 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4