| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>, pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? |
| Date: | 2000-01-02 02:10:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200001020210.VAA05416@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am attaching a diff to fix the problem. We were reporting only a
> > 2-digit year, and tm_year reports years since 1900, so it was reporting
> > 100 for year 2000. The field was %02d, but the number was three digits
> > so it printed all three.
>
> If you are going to go to 4-digit years in timestamps, I think you also
> need to increase the TIMESTAMP_SIZE constant used by elog.c when
> ELOG_TIMESTAMPS is set.
>
> An alternative solution is to print time->tm_year % 100.
>
> Either of these solutions might break existing programs that analyze
> logfiles, if any there be...
Done. Length increased by 2 from 28 to 30.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-02 03:09:38 | Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-02 02:06:22 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? |