Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Date: 2010-08-10 12:01:31
Message-ID: 1f74c7cb3b4bdcd668d03ab789f1b242.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, August 10, 2010 13:18, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
>> switches as well as pg_dump?
>>
>> $ pg_restore -t tbl1 -t tbl2 db.dump
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Yes. :)
>
> What other functionality in pg_dump does pg_restore not duplicate?
>

See also "pg_restore -t table : can silently omit constraints":
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-04/msg00269.php

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-08-10 12:32:38 Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-08-10 11:18:55 Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?