| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl promote wait |
| Date: | 2016-08-06 01:43:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1d761bbc-27f7-2e5f-678f-213232e94cfb@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/5/16 12:14 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> In do_stop, this patches makes the wait happen for a maximum of
> wait_seconds * 2, once when getting the control file information, and
> once when waiting for the server to shut down.
That's not how I read it. get_controlfile() will decrease the
wait_seconds argument by how much wait time it has used. The wait for
shutdown will then only use as much seconds as are left.
> This is not a good
> idea, and the idea of putting a wait argument in get_controlfile does
> not seem a good interface to me. I'd rather see get_controlfile be
> extended with a flag saying no_error_on_failure and keep the wait
> logic within pg_ctl.
I guess we could write a wrapper function in pg_ctl that encapsulated
the wait logic.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-06 03:04:33 | Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-06 01:40:35 | Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft |