Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date: 2008-02-06 20:41:09
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10802061241v580ab9cctd99a8daccdb86835@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 6, 2008 9:56 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Whenever a commit fest is in progress, the
> focus will shift from development to review, feedback and commit of
> patches. Each fest will continue until all patches in the queue have
> either been committed to the CVS repository, returned to the author
> for additional work, or rejected outright, and until that has
> happened, no new patches will be considered.

If we don't have a bench farm anytime soon, I think we should consider
planning a set of benchmarks after each commit fest to prevent
performance regressions on different workloads. I don't expect them to
be comprehensive but it could allow us to prevent the most obvious
regressions.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-02-06 20:46:22 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-02-06 20:35:54 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan