| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 20:46:22 |
| Message-ID: | 17037.1202330782@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Josh Berkus escribi:
>>> I think we might want to do something along the lines of what Stefan set
>>> up (at least I think it was he) for the end of 8.4 on
>>> developer.postgresql.org. Bruce's patch list is easy to update, but hard
>>> to read. I'll put some effort into it.
> Yes, I feel we could use a group writeable patch queue of some sort. Perhaps
> an IMAP server setup could do the job.
Seems like a wiki page with links to pgsql-patches archive entries would
be easy. But an issue for any of this is who has permissions to edit
the queue? I concur that "Bruce only" is the wrong answer, but I'm not
sure "anyone with a wiki account" is the right answer.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-02-06 20:58:03 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-02-06 20:41:09 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |