| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Russell Smith" <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| Date: | 2008-01-28 06:55:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10801272255s69fb7e78qbbb49ae4c80a9be@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi Russell,
On Jan 28, 2008 7:27 AM, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> Can somebody explain why it's important to load with
> synchronized_scanning off?
>
> do_sql_command(g_conn, "SET synchronized_scanning TO off");
It's the start point of this patch. See this thread [
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00987.php ]
for more information.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Premsun Choltanwanich | 2008-01-28 07:18:30 | Slow Query problem |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2008-01-28 06:54:24 | Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Russell Smith | 2008-01-28 08:59:18 | Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2008-01-28 06:54:24 | Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |