Re: Inconsistency in extended-query-protocol logging

On 9/13/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> statement: querystring Simple Query
> parse <stmt>: querystring Parse
> bind <stmt>/<portal>: querystring Bind
> execute <stmt>/<portal>: querystring Execute

I agree with that.
Hmmm, AFAICS, you changed "<stmt>/<portal>" to "<portal> to
<statement>" in your last commit. Or did I misunderstand?

> or these prefixed with "duration: xxx", as appropriate. Bruce was
> pretty hot about having statement: in there, so the hard part might
> be to convince him.

Bruce, any opinion? I really think the extended query protocol is not
a statement stricly speaking.

> Also, the current code distinguishes a "fetch" from an
> already-partially-executed portal ... do you care about that?

I don't really understand what is a portal - I must admit I don't use
libpq directly. I never saw a log file with fetch. Do you have an
example? Should I consider an execute from fetch differently?

--
Guillaume