| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-04 08:52:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10608040152jebc1095ged8bf2e0043476f2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/4/06, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> wrote:
> My ordering of this list in terms of priority is:
>
> 1) Windowing functions
> 2) MERGE
> 3) Index only access (new)
> 4) In-place upgrades
And what about compression of on-disk sorting? There has been a long
thread about this idea. Is there any news about this feature? IIRC Jim
Nasby and Martijn were working on testing that and on validating it
was interesting for most of the cases.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | alfranio correia junior | 2006-08-04 08:54:09 | standard interfaces for replication providers |
| Previous Message | Adrian Maier | 2006-08-04 07:47:26 | Re: 8.2 features status |