Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of
Date: 2003-03-20 15:39:50
Message-ID: 1d150e981ebab6162f5cd86a1e87034f@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Moral of the Story:
>
> A smaller file to download (via better compression) only decreases the
> time it takes to download.

I think the real argument in favor of providing a bz2 alternative to gz
*is* the time to download. Loading a Postgres tarball over a dialup line
is much faster with bz2 rather than gz. This has been covered on the list
before: I recall that most everyone agreed it was a good idea, but nobody
on the website appeared ready to follow through with it and actually
set up the bz2 files.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303201036
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+eeCfvJuQZxSWSsgRAvy+AJ9wWoOgXezn3p01/D4jed2sNqT6DQCfXkz5
0uvv7khQJ4LAXMYydMnpWdM=
=Lg8Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-20 15:43:38 Re: Big insert/delete memory problems
Previous Message Ennio Iannucci 2003-03-20 15:39:16 [NOVICE] Extended display and extended ascii characters