| From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "PostgreSQL Developers List (E-mail)" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: System tables since 7.0.0 |
| Date: | 2000-07-19 07:07:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B0F8@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
One of these is now fixed, but the other (pg_proc) I'm not sure about.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Mount [mailto:petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 7:53 AM
To: PostgreSQL Developers List (E-mail)
Subject: [HACKERS] System tables since 7.0.0
Has anything changed in the system tables pg_proc or pg_type since 7.0.0 was
released?
This morning I've seen two weird reports on Interfaces that are showing
NullPointerExceptions occuring on internal queries to those two tables (in
different classes, one queries just pg_type the other pg_proc). There's
nothing special about these queries so I'm just wondering if it's something
more sinister going on.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2000-07-19 08:16:13 | The query cache - first snapshot (long) |
| Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2000-07-19 06:53:01 | System tables since 7.0.0 |