RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Anand Raman'" <araman(at)india-today(dot)com>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver
Date: 2000-05-03 11:13:38
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C568@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

A fresh CVS copy from about 0900 this morning (UK time). For JDBC that
should be the same as the current release candidate.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Anand Raman [mailto:araman(at)india-today(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11:53 AM
To: Peter Mount; Bruce Momjian
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver

Hi peter
Which beta release of postgresql700 are you using.
I am on postgresql 7.0 beta5
Could it cause the mentioned problems
Thanx for ur time
Anand Raman

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: 'Anand Raman' <araman(at)india-today(dot)com>; Bruce Momjian
<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver

> Hmmm, interesting, especially as Field hasn't changed since 6.5.2...
>
> Peter
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2000-05-03 11:43:11 RE: Why Not MySQL?
Previous Message David Jack Olrik 2000-05-03 11:07:03 plperl is still disabled