From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Date: | 2000-05-02 13:25:35 |
Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C553@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
By the sounds of it, it did get in (because the earlier one wouldn't
have known about the org change).
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 2:15 PM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Peter Mount; Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development;
PostgreSQL-interfaces
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
> I got the file that Jan overwrote to fix Peter's overwrite and
installed
> that in the jdbc directory.
Yeah, I understood that. Peter will speak up soon, but he indicated
that he wasn't sure that his new Makefile ever made it into CVS in the
first place, if I read his mail correctly.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-02 13:40:43 | Re: Patch submission |
Previous Message | SAKAIDA Masaaki | 2000-05-02 13:21:36 | Re: psql \l error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-02 16:02:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-02 13:14:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |