| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption |
| Date: | 1999-12-25 15:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | 199912251513.KAA20667@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I had the system logging with debug level 3 and there was nothing in the
> logs. Did anything get fixed in this area between 6.5.2 and 6.5.3? I.e.
> should I upgrade? I'd rather not just at the moment.
No:
Release 6.5.3
This is basically a cleanup release for 6.5.2. We have added a new
pgaccess
that was missing in 6.5.2, and installed an NT-specific fix.
Migration to v6.5.3
A dump/restore is not required for those running 6.5.*.
Detailed Change List
Updated version of pgaccess 0.98
NT-specific patch
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 1999-12-25 22:25:47 | Re: [HACKERS] database replication |
| Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 1999-12-25 12:59:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption |