Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed
Date: 1999-12-20 04:40:52
Message-ID: 199912200440.XAA25315@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > We could argue that Postgres is the super-user for the database, it
> > should be zero userid.
>
> Actually, that's quite a good thought --- is there *any* real need
> for initdb to extract the UID of the postgres user? What we do need,
> I think, is the *name* of the postgres user, which we might perhaps
> get with something like
>
> whoami 2>/dev/null || id -u -n 2>/dev/null || echo postgres

We currently have:

EffectiveUser=`id -n -u 2> /dev/null` || EffectiveUser=`whoami 2> /dev/null`

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-20 05:24:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-12-20 04:19:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed