Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster?
Date: 1999-11-26 04:02:57
Message-ID: 199911260402.XAA21454@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset KOI8-R unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
>
> On 25-Nov-99 Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 01:33:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> > it. I think the pid file could be placed under $PGDATA. Opinions?
> >> ...
> >> $PGDATA seems like the right place to put the file, since we can only
> >> have one active postmaster at a time in a database directory.
> >
> > Ehem, I think the correct place would be /var/run. At least that's what the
> > filesystem standard says IIRC.
>
> I agree ...
>

I think the idea was to put the file in /data, and symlink to /tmp or
/var/run.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-26 04:11:25 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-11-26 02:12:57