| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | davidb(at)vectormath(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ... |
| Date: | 1999-11-23 17:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 199911231740.MAA05444@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> At 01:18 AM 23-11-1999 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> If the priorities include stability and reliability, that's what you get.
> >> If the priorities are features at any cost, you get junk.
> >>
> >> Though Open Source projects are less susceptible to featuritis, they're far
> >> from immune. Trouble is many PHBs only compare stuff feature by brochure
> >> feature.
> >
> >We only do 2-3 major releases a year for a reason. If it is not
> >reliable, it is useless. This is not a computer game.
>
> Yep. Glad to hear that.
Read our development history on our web site. It discusses this.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ^chewie | 1999-11-23 18:01:32 | Re: [GENERAL] Socket file lock |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 1999-11-23 17:26:17 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications? |