Rules and referential integrity

From: "<Miguel Sofer" <mig(at)utdt(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Rules and referential integrity
Date: 1999-11-12 15:13:55
Message-ID: 199911121513.MAA06784@ant.utdt
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

I seem to have found a way to use the rule system for referential
integrity checks.

The manual says (in the "Rules vs Triggers part)
"It is possible, to place a qualified rule that rewrites a query to
NOTHING if the value of a column does not appear in another table. But
then the data is silently thrown away and that's not a good idea. If
checks for valid values are required, and in the case of an invalid
value an error message should be generated, it must be done by a
trigger for now."

Now: why not define a function (in pltcl; could be something else?)

create function err(bpchar) returns bpchar
as 'error $1' language 'pltcl'

Then, if the value of a column does not appear in another table, you
could rewrite the query to (for instance)
select err('your message')

This will raise a PGRES_FATAL_ERROR , with error message
ERROR: pltcl: your message

So: it is possible. Why it is better (or worse) than a trigger, I do
not know. Views on that?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-11-12 16:13:50 Re: [SQL] Rules and referential integrity
Previous Message marten 1999-11-12 07:55:30 Re: [SQL] HAVING in EXISTS-clause ...