Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table
Date: 1999-10-20 01:05:19
Message-ID: 199910200105.KAA23681@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Oh dear. I had tested it with smaller files and concluded that it was
>no slower than before ... I guess there is some effect I'm not seeing
>here. Can you tell whether the extra time is computation or I/O (how
>much does the runtime of the backend change between old and new code)?

How can I do this? Maybe I should run the backend in stand alone mode?
---
Tatsuo Ishii

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-10-20 01:09:13 RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-20 00:37:45 Re: [HACKERS] book