From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) |
Date: | 1999-10-11 17:04:56 |
Message-ID: | 199910111704.NAA05891@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> > I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> > underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> > apocalypse ;)
>
> But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?
>
> Isn't the point to avoid naming conflicts. Symlinks won't help that,
> surely.
>
> I agree; underscores are a pain. If you must go this direction, I
> suggest hyphens (-).
You could make the actual command pg_createuser, and make a symlink of
createuser, but allow the symlink creation to fail. Best of both
worlds, I think. I vote for underscore. That's what I normally use.
Dashes look too much like command arguments.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-11 17:05:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) |
Previous Message | Brook Milligan | 1999-10-11 16:58:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-11 17:05:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) |
Previous Message | Brook Milligan | 1999-10-11 16:58:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) |