Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)

From: Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Date: 1999-10-11 16:56:30
Message-ID: 199910111656.KAA17620@biology.nmsu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> apocalypse ;)

But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?

Isn't the point to avoid naming conflicts. Symlinks won't help that,
surely.

I agree; underscores are a pain. If you must go this direction, I
suggest hyphens (-).

Cheers,
Brook

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brook Milligan 1999-10-11 16:58:14 Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-11 15:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brook Milligan 1999-10-11 16:58:14 Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-11 15:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)