Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Date: 1999-09-28 01:21:15
Message-ID: 199909280121.KAA05419@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom, you already handled this, right?
>
>Someone committed it, not sure if it was me.

I have comitted changes to both the statble and the current.

>I was worried whether vacuum's other expandable lists needed the same
>treatment, but Hiroshi and/or Tatsuo seemed to think it wasn't worth the
>trouble to change them. So I guess the item is closed.

I think so.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-09-28 01:32:39 Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-09-28 00:42:31 RE: [HACKERS] Frustration