Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
Date: 1999-09-23 15:31:04
Message-ID: 199909231531.LAA16699@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> So, I'm going to declare victory and go home ;-). We ought to add a
> TODO item along the lines of
> * Functions returning sets don't really work right
> in hopes that someone will feel like tackling this someday.

Added to TODO, with your e-mail messages archived:

* Functions returning sets don't really work right(see TODO.detail/functions)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-23 15:39:18 Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-09-23 15:28:51 Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions