Re: [HACKERS] Command Locations (was Re: HISTORY for 6.5....)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Simms <grim(at)argh(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Command Locations (was Re: HISTORY for 6.5....)
Date: 1999-09-20 00:02:35
Message-ID: 199909200002.UAA07772@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I state things the way I do because RedHat is shipping PostgreSQL as a piece of
> bona-fide Systems software -- fundamentally part of their distribution. This
> changes all the rules -- turns them on end, in reality. While a FHS-compliant
> linux distribution that does not ship PostgreSQL would need PostgreSQL in
> /usr/local (after all, an OS upgrade could destroy it if it's installed
> elsewhere), RedHat needs it in the FHS-mandated locations, because PostgreSQL
> is part of RedHat's OS. And, I am attempting to maintain a peice that is
> shipping as part of their OS -- which gives me a slightly different point of
> view from other PostgreSQL developers/maintainers.

Sure, makes sense.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-09-20 01:24:31 Re: [HACKERS] Notice: heap_open/close changes committed
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-09-19 21:17:18 Re: [HACKERS] Command Locations (was Re: HISTORY for 6.5....)