Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused

> > 1. Why did the new pgaccess get installed into REL6_5 branch but not
> > main development branch?
> >
>
> No sense putting in development because there will probably be a newer
> version by the time 6.6 is released, no?
>
> Yes there will be, but it seems to serve two purposes. One is that
> anyone working with the development tree at least has some version of
> pgaccess handy. More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
> last moment. Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.

It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026