| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused |
| Date: | 1999-09-17 04:11:46 |
| Message-ID: | 199909170411.AAA06957@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 1. Why did the new pgaccess get installed into REL6_5 branch but not
> main development branch?
>
No sense putting in development because there will probably be a newer
version by the time 6.6 is released, no?
> 2. New pgaccess no longer has a Makefile in src/bin/pgaccess, which
> is a problem because src/bin/Makefile tries to run a sub-make in that
> directory when configured --with-tcl. Lack of the sub-Makefile looks
> bogus to me; it may not need to do anything for "make all" but it sure
> ought to do something for "make install", no?
Yes. I was not in favor of adding new pgaccess in 6.5.2, but was
out-voted.
I have re-added the Makefile that appeared in the development tree.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-17 04:45:49 | Re: [QUESTIONS] errors on transactions and locks ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-09-17 01:53:52 | pgaccess seems a tad confused |