Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status?
Date: 1999-09-08 22:34:40
Message-ID: 199909082234.SAA27594@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Reference my message to Tom Lane. Yes, such a program would be hard --
> but most of it is already written and available in CVS -- thank God for
> CVS! -- all that's needed is to extract the storage managers for each
> major version, extract the reading code, etc, to get the on-disk
> representation to an intermediate in memory form, then write it out with
> the latest and greatest storage manager (into a different file, of
> course, until the upgrade is finished). Unless I badly misunderstand
> the way PostgreSQL does things, that should work -- but I may not have
> expressed it the same way I see it in my mind.

Do a cost/benefit analysis on that one. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-09-08 22:40:37 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-09-08 22:22:49 Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status?