Re: [HACKERS] temp table oddness?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] temp table oddness?
Date: 1999-09-04 22:21:29
Message-ID: 199909042221.SAA17926@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I found weird behavior with temp tables.
> >
> > test=> create table u1(i int);
> > CREATE
> > test=> insert into u1 values(1);
> > INSERT 3408201 1
> > test=> insert into u1 values(1);
> > INSERT 3408202 1
> > test=> create temp table u1(i int primary key);
> > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'u1_pkey' for table 'u1'
> > NOTICE: trying to delete a reldesc that does not exist.
> > NOTICE: trying to delete a reldesc that does not exist.
> > CREATE
> >
> > Are these notices normal?
>
> OK, looks fixed. Tatsuo, please test current cvs tree. Thanks.

Let me add Tom Lane did much of the fixing too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-09-04 22:33:16 Re: [HACKERS] temp table oddness?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-04 22:14:45 Re: [HACKERS] temp table oddness?