Re: [HACKERS] RE: Joins and links

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: Joins and links
Date: 1999-07-07 07:47:23
Message-ID: 199907070747.DAA08287@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> All,
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> The question I ask myself though is, are there any concrete plans for
> >> referential integrity via foreign key clauses? 6.6, 7.0,
> >> never? To me,
> >> that's really much more important than query speed or MVCC.
> I'd have to go along with this, because I've noticed that DRI is a LOT
> faster than using triggers to implement RI. Although not on PG (on Oracle
> actually), I think that the results can be extrapolated closely enough. DRI
> reduces the implementation overhead dramatically.

This is on our 6.6 short list, and someone has said he will work on it
"after 6.5".

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-07 08:16:51 Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks in relcache
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-07 07:44:22 Re: [GENERAL] inet and cidr type problems