From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] RE: Joins and links |
Date: | 1999-07-07 07:47:23 |
Message-ID: | 199907070747.DAA08287@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> All,
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> The question I ask myself though is, are there any concrete plans for
> >> referential integrity via foreign key clauses? 6.6, 7.0,
> >> never? To me,
> >> that's really much more important than query speed or MVCC.
> I'd have to go along with this, because I've noticed that DRI is a LOT
> faster than using triggers to implement RI. Although not on PG (on Oracle
> actually), I think that the results can be extrapolated closely enough. DRI
> reduces the implementation overhead dramatically.
This is on our 6.6 short list, and someone has said he will work on it
"after 6.5".
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-07 08:16:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks in relcache |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-07 07:44:22 | Re: [GENERAL] inet and cidr type problems |