| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Fast join |
| Date: | 1999-06-29 15:09:18 |
| Message-ID: | 199906291509.LAA02017@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > Also, if a join does most of the table, it is faster do not use indexes,
> > and just sort on the backend.
> >
>
> The problem is - when you want just a small part of the table(s) and
> you have indices to facilitate qualifications, Postgres doesn't
> use 'em ! This is a question of Life and Death - i.e. to use or
> not to use Postgres.
As I remember, your qualification was x > 10. That may not be
restrictive enough to make an index faster.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leon | 1999-06-29 15:33:41 | Re: [GENERAL] Fast join |
| Previous Message | Leon | 1999-06-29 14:00:53 | Re: [GENERAL] Fast join |